Hungarian Online Resources

est. 1993 by UMCP Hungarian American Student Association

The Events of March 3, 1848

Kossuth’s March 3 address

Addressing the diet (session of parliament) in Pozsony*,
delegate Kossuth demanded the following major reforms from the
Lower House:

1. Abolish censorship, i.e. freedom of
thepress. 2. A Hungarian Ministry. 3. Annual Diet, elected by
universal suffrage. 4. Equality of all before the law.
5.Formation of a national guard. 6. No tax exemption for nobility
or clergy. 7. Suppression of feudal rights. 8. Elected juries for
criminal cases. 9. A national bank. 10. Create a national
army.11. Liberate political prisoners. 12. Unite Transylvania
with Hungary

KOSSUTH

Afraid the Upper House would dilute and delay
action, Kossuth suggested the list be taken directly to the
monarch. On March 14, the Upper House supported the motion and a
delegation, headed by Kossuth took it as “Address to
theThrone” for accession by Ferdinand V.

* During the
Turkish occupation in the 16th and 17th century, the Hungarian
parliament moved out of the occupied heartland, and held its
sessions in Pozsony (now Bratislava, Slovakia; Pressburg in
German, Posonium** in Latin). The Habsburg kings, were crowned
here in
St. Martin’s cathedral.

FERDINAND V

**For a medieval view of “Posonium” Click here

Aptil 11 saw the acceptance of
the April laws. Approved by the Diet, (the session having
been personally closed by the king in the archbishop’s palace) 31
new laws largely reflected the Kossuth demands of March 3. They
were – in a sense – a new constitution, reputedly modelled after
that of Belgium.

Archbishop’s Palace

Discussed and voted on in haste,
the April laws contained some inconsistent elements, but
clearly reflected the Diet’s desire to emphasize Hungary’s
independent thrust.

Some major issues :

  • The King to exercise power
    through a responsible minister (without his endorsement
    no order to be valid).
  • The bicameral Diet to be
    convoked annually at Pest, the members being elected for
    three year terms.
  • The King may dissolve the
    Diet, but obliged to convoke a new one within three
    months.
  • No dismissal until next
    years’ budget approved.
  • The two elements were the
    Chamber of deputies and Chamber of Magnates.
  • Chamber
    of Magnates

    • Franchised to vote were
      citizens who paid taxes, also those with secondary or
      higher education.
    • Official language to be
      Hungarian, save Latin in some instances.

    Other elements :

    • While endorsing freedom of
      the press, inciting against the person of the King or
      other parts of the Habsburg empire considered a crime.
    • While creating a cabinet
      post of “Minister of War”, its authority not
      delineated :

      – jurisdiction over
      Hungarian units stationed anywhere (e.g. in
      Italy) ?
      – or over imperial
      forces (regardless of nationality) stationed in
      Hungary ?
      – deployment of
      Hungarian troops “beyond the borders”
      to require the “countersignature of the
      responsible minister”.
    • Borders not defined :
    • – of Hungary ?
      – of the empire ?
    • Some obligations of
      “the peasants” relieved, others maintained.

    Philosophically many had
    questioned whether the April laws were to provide broad
    equality or a rear-guard action by the nobility (i.e. Diet
    members) to preclude more radical steps.

    The April laws had other
    deficiencies :

    Relations with the several
    minorities (Slovaks, Rumanians, Serbs, etc.) not defined, while
    Hungarian declared the official language.Croatia-Slavonia had been an autonomous region of the
    Hungarian Crown – its status undefined.
    As was seen later, the anti-Hungarian faction in Vienna took full
    advantage of such inconsistencies to undermine the Hungarian
    government.
    Sensing the unclear interface with Austria, Prince Esterházy
    approached Austrian minister Pillersdorf to establish a
    commission to deliberate common issues. The Hungarian
    representative, Ferenc Pulszky, was cut short in his efforts,
    when the Austrians adjourned the commissions’ activities.

    Back to Milestones of 1848-49